Organizations that need to validate, through actual exploitation, whether their technical vulnerabilities are genuinely exploitable.
Last updated — August 22, 2026
An automated vulnerability scan produces a list of theoretical flaws without indicating which ones are actually exploitable in your context. Without operational validation, your teams end up prioritizing fixes blindly, based on a generic score rather than actual risk.
—
Detailed report with reproducible exploitation paths
—
CVSS v4.0 scoring per vulnerability
—
Proof-of-concept evidence
—
Remediation plan
—
Retest included within 60 days
—
A test attestation you can share with your own customers
Varies by scope and testing mode (black, grey, or white box), typically 5 to 15 days
Typical duration
Black box simulates an attacker with no prior information; grey box starts from limited access (a typical user account); white box grants full access, including source code, for maximum coverage.
Yes. For an equivalent scope, a white-box audit with code access typically costs 30-50% more than a black-box test, due to the additional analysis time that code access enables.
The retest performed within 60 days of the initial report delivery is included in the service, to verify that reported vulnerabilities have been fixed.
Yes, the test attestation is designed to be shared with your clients or partners as proof that testing was performed, without disclosing the report's technical content.
The risk is minimized through prior scoping of the perimeter and authorized techniques. Any potentially disruptive activity (denial of service, testing on live data) is excluded by default and can only be conducted under explicit written agreement.